The articles in this special issue on the Supreme Court’s decision in Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinka, LLP1 provide thoughtful contributions to the continuing debate over the significance of the Court’s most recent pronouncement on monopolization law under section 2 of the Sherman Act. One reason-perhaps the main reason-for the competing and seemingly irreconcilable interpretations of the Trinka decision reflected in the articles that follow is the unusual volume of dicta in Justice Scalia’s opinion.
To read further in-depth information, download the full article here.